2025-12-18

claude knows chess: Moeller vs. Caruana, Hamburg 2005

I wrote a package (with claude and gemini's help) that takes a database of Caruana games, runs them all through stockfish for analysis, then ranks them, then creates a terse latex report for selected top games (such as the game discussed in this column, bwt, I plan to post these python files to github at some point). This latex report was run through Claude and a "chess blog version" of the report was created. The markdown response from claude (sonnet 4.5) was converted to html using pacdoc. I edited this html in emacs, mostly for readability. I'm most impressed by the fact that clever moves can be missed but stockfish finds it anyway (see moves 27 and 28 below). Enjoy!
(The image above is from chess.com, dated 2007, making him 15 at the time of the photo. He is 13 in the game below.).

A Future World Championship Challenger at Age 13: Moeller vs. Caruana, Hamburg 2005

The Tournament

The Hamburg Robinow Open 2005 took place in early October in the historic Hanseatic city of Hamburg, Germany. This traditional open tournament attracted players of varying strengths, from club players to titled professionals, creating the kind of competitive melting pot where young talents could test themselves against experienced opposition.

Among the participants was a 13-year-old American-Italian prodigy named Fabiano Caruana, rated 2373 and already a FIDE Master. Born on July 30, 1992, in Miami, Caruana had relocated with his family from Brooklyn to Europe in 2004 to pursue serious chess training. At the time of this tournament, he was studying under strong coaches and rapidly climbing the rating ladder. Within two years, he would become the youngest grandmaster in both US and Italian history, and in 2018, he would challenge Magnus Carlsen for the World Championship.

His second-round opponent was Hendrik Moeller (2160), a solid German club player giving up over 200 rating points. While such a rating difference suggests a clear favorite, chess is never that simple—especially in open tournaments where upsets are common.

Game Details: - Event: Hamburg Robinow Open 2005 - Date: October 2, 2005 - Round: 2 - Time Control: Standard (likely 90 minutes + 30 seconds increment) - White: Hendrik Moeller (2160) - Black: Fabiano Caruana (2373) - Result: 0-1 (Black wins)


The Opening: A Preview of World Championship Chess

The game opened with the Sicilian Defense, Sveshnikov Variation, one of the most theoretically demanding and dynamic openings in chess. What makes this game particularly fascinating for modern chess fans is that White chose the relatively rare 7.Nd5 continuation—the exact same line that Caruana himself would employ 13 years later as White against Magnus Carlsen in Games 8, 10, and 12 of the 2018 World Championship match in London!

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5

This is the defining move of the Sveshnikov. Black boldly kicks the knight away, accepting a permanent weakness on d5 in exchange for dynamic piece play and central space.

6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5!

Position after 7.Nd5:
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r |   | b | q | k | b |   | r | 8
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | p | p |   |   |   | p | p | p | 7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   | n | p |   | n |   |   | 6
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   | N | N |   | p |   |   |   | 5
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   |   |   | P |   |   |   | 4
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 3
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | P | P |   |   | P | P | P | 2
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R |   | B | Q | K | B |   | R | 1
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

Instead of the main line 7.Bg5, White immediately occupies the d5 outpost. This seems to “solve” Black’s theoretical problems—by exchanging knights, Black eliminates the weakness on d5. However, White gains a different kind of advantage: space, a queenside pawn majority, and easy piece development without the usual headache of the misplaced knight on a3. The practical results have been promising for White, which is why Caruana revived this line at the highest level.

7…Nxd5 8.exd5 Nb8!

The retreat looks odd but is entirely correct. Black regroups with …Nd7, aiming for …f5 and kingside counterplay while White pushes on the queenside.


The Game with Analysis

Full PGN:

[Event "Hamburg Robinow Open"]
[Site "Hamburg, Germany"]
[Date "2005.10.02"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Moeller, Hendrik"]
[Black "Caruana, Fabiano"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2160"]
[BlackElo "2373"]
[ECO "B33"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 Nxd5
8.exd5 Nb8 9.c4 Be7 10.Be2 O-O 11.O-O Nd7 12.Qc2 a6 13.Nc3 f5 14.f4 Qb6+
15.Kh1 g6 16.g3 Bf6 17.Rb1 Qc7 18.Qd2 Bg7 19.Qe3 Re8 20.Qf2 Nb6 21.c5 dxc5
22.Be3 exf4 23.gxf4 Bxc3 24.bxc3 Nxd5 25.Bd2 b6 26.Bf3 Bb7 27.Qg2 Rad8
28.c4 Nf6 29.Bxb7 Rxd2 30.Qxd2 Qxb7+ 31.Qg2 Ne4 32.Kg1 Rd8 33.Rfd1 Qc7
34.Rxd8+ Qxd8 35.Qb2 Qd3 36.Rf1 Nd2 37.Rf2 Nxc4 38.Qf6 Qd1+ 39.Rf1 Qg4+
40.Kh1 Qe2 41.Kg1 Nd2 42.Rf2 Qxf2+ 0-1

Phase 1: The Opening (Moves 1-15)

The opening followed established theory smoothly. After 9.c4 (reinforcing the d5 pawn), 9…Be7 10.Be2 O-O 11.O-O! (an excellent developing move), Black continued with 11…Nd7, preparing …f5.

12.Qc2?! was the first slight inaccuracy. The queen doesn’t do much on c2, and 12.Bd2 would have been more flexible, keeping options open for where the queen should go. The young Caruana immediately punished this with 12…a6! 13.Nc3! (the knight has to retreat) 13…f5! striking in the center.

After 14.f4 (necessary to prevent …f4 clamping down) 14…Qb6+?! was a somewhat loosening check. White correctly replied 15.Kh1!, tucking the king safely away.

Phase 2: Positional Maneuvering (Moves 16-22)

16.g3?

This was White’s first significant error. By weakening the kingside pawn structure, White created long-term vulnerabilities. The engine strongly preferred 16.Bd2, keeping a solid structure and preparing to challenge Black’s pieces.

Caruana reacted perfectly with 16…Bf6!, placing the bishop actively and eyeing the weakened dark squares.

After 17.Rb1 Qc7 18.Qd2? (another inaccuracy; 18.Be3 was better, developing with tempo), the position evolved with 18…Bg7 19.Qe3?! Re8?! 20.Qf2 Nb6 21.c5?! dxc5.

Phase 3: The Critical Moment (Moves 22-25)

22.Be3 exf4

Black opens the position at exactly the right moment. Now came the critical decision…

23.gxf4?

Position after 23.gxf4:
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r |   | b |   | r |   | k |   | 8
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   | p | q |   |   |   | b | p | 7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | p | n |   |   |   |   | p |   | 6
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   |   | p | P |   | p |   |   | 5
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   |   |   |   | P |   |   | 4
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   | N |   | B |   |   |   | 3
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | P |   |   | B | Q |   | P | 2
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 |   | R |   |   |   | R |   | K | 1
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

This recapture was a serious blunder. 23.Bxf4 was essential, keeping the pawn structure intact and maintaining better coordination. By taking with the g-pawn, White ripped open his own king’s defenses, creating a target that Black would exploit.

23…Bxc3 An excellent exchange. Black removes the defender of d5 and damages White’s structure.

24.bxc3? Another mistake in a difficult position. 24.d6! was trickier, trying to create counterplay. After the text, Black wins the d5 pawn.

24…Nxd5 25.Bd2

White tries to reorganize, but…

25…b6?

Even the young Caruana wasn’t immune to mistakes! This natural-looking move was a significant error. 25…Nf6! was much stronger, keeping the knight centralized and maintaining Black’s advantage. After the text, White had a chance to complicate matters.

Phase 4: Mutual Errors and the Endgame (Moves 26-35)

26.Bf3 Bb7 27.Qg2 Rad8?

This was Black’s worst moment. Offering the exchange sac, 27…Re4! was the right move. White can’t take it, so it activates the rook with tempo. The text allowed White significant counterplay.

28.c4 Nf6 29.Bxb7 Rxd2 30.Qxd2 Qxb7+ 31.Qg2?

White returned the favor. 31.Kg1 was safer, keeping the king tucked away. Now Black regained a clear advantage.

31…Ne4?! 32.Kg1! Rd8? 33.Rfd1 Qc7! 34.Rxd8+ Qxd8 35.Qb2?

White continues to struggle. 35.Qe2 offered better chances to hold. The queen on b2 proves misplaced.

Phase 5: The Winning Attack (Moves 36-42)

35…Qd3?! 36.Rf1?! Nd2! 37.Rf2! Nxc4

Black has won a pawn and the knight on c4 is beautifully placed.

38.Qf6??

Position after 38.Qf6:
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 |   |   |   |   |   |   | k |   | 8
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | p | 7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | p | p |   |   |   | Q | p |   | 6
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   |   | p |   |   | p |   |   | 5
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   | n |   |   | P |   |   | 4
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   |   | q |   |   |   |   | 3
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P |   |   |   |   | R |   | P | 2
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 |   |   |   |   |   |   | K |   | 1
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

A blunder in a difficult position. 38.Qe2 was necessary to keep fighting. The queen on f6 looks aggressive but allows a devastating counterattack.

38…Qd1+ 39.Rf1 Qg4+ 40.Kh1 Qe2 41.Kg1?! Nd2

The knight returns with devastating effect.

42.Rf2?

Final Position after 42.Rf2:
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 |   |   |   |   |   |   | k |   | 8
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | p | 7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | p | p |   |   |   | Q | p |   | 6
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   |   | p |   |   | p |   |   | 5
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   |   |   |   | P |   |   | 4
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 3
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P |   |   | n | q | R |   | P | 2
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 |   |   |   |   |   |   | K |   | 1
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

The final blunder. 42.Qd8+ was the only defense, aiming for a queen trade that might at least gave practical chances. Now Black wins immediately.

42…Qxf2+!

White resigned. After 43.Kxf2 Ne4+ Black forks the king and queen and emerges a full piece ahead with an easy win.

0-1


Lessons for Club Players

1. Pawn Structure Matters More Than You Think

White’s 16.g3 and 23.gxf4 both damaged his pawn structure around the king. Even without immediate tactics, these weaknesses persisted and eventually proved fatal. Lesson: Before moving pawns in front of your castled king, ask yourself if you’re creating permanent weaknesses.

2. Knights Need Outposts

Black’s knight on d5 dominated the game after 24…Nxd5. Later, the knight on c4 and d2 caused havoc. In contrast, White’s pieces never found stable squares. Lesson: Trade your opponent’s pieces that control key squares, then occupy those squares yourself.

3. Piece Activity Over Material

Several times Black exchanged material to gain activity (23…Bxc3, 29…Rxd2). The young Caruana understood that in dynamic positions, coordination trumps material counting. Lesson: Don’t cling to material if it means passive pieces.

4. Rooks Belong on Open Files and the 7th Rank

Black’s heavy pieces repeatedly invaded on the d-file and second rank. Lesson: After the center opens, ask “where do my rooks want to be?” and work toward that.

5. Even Strong Players Make Mistakes

Caruana’s 25…b6 and 27…Rad8 were significant errors that could have changed the result. But he kept fighting and capitalized when White erred. Lesson: Stay focused. Your opponent will make mistakes too—be ready to pounce.

6. Study Opening Theory, But Understand the Ideas

The 7.Nd5 Sveshnikov shows how knowing why moves are played matters more than memorizing variations. White played reasonable-looking moves but missed the strategic subtleties. Lesson: For each opening you play, understand the key plans for both sides.


Historical Footnote

This game offers a remarkable window into Fabiano Caruana’s development. At 13, he was already capable of handling complex strategic positions against experienced opposition, even while making the occasional error. His fighting spirit—continuing to press even after mistakes—would become a hallmark of his career.

The opening itself would gain renewed attention in 2018 when Caruana employed 7.Nd5 as White against Magnus Carlsen in their World Championship match. Having been on the Black side of this structure as a youth, Caruana deeply understood both sides of the position—a testament to how early tournament experience shapes a player’s strategic understanding.

The Hamburg Robinow Open 2005 may not be a famous tournament, but for one young American-Italian boy, it was another stepping stone on the path to becoming one of the greatest players of his generation.


Analysis performed with Stockfish 17.1 at depth 20. All evaluations converted from centipawn scores to descriptive assessments for clarity.

2025-12-06

claude knows chess: Xiong vs Caruana, 2019-03-25, US Chess Championship, round 6

I wrote a package (with claude and gemini's help) that takes a database of Caruana games, runs them all through stockfish for analysis, then ranks them, then creates a terse latex report for selected top games (such as the game discussed in this column, bwt, I plan to post these python files to github at some point). This latex report was run through Claude and a "chess blog version" of the report was created. The markdown response from claude (sonnet 4.5) was converted to html using pacdoc. I edited this html in emacs, mostly for readability. Enjoy! (The image below is from nbcdfw.com.)
To repeat: based on the above-mentioned python-stockfish programs, claude wrote this blog post, with some minor editing by wdj.

World Championship Challenger Meets Rising Star: Caruana vs Xiong at the 2019 US Chess Championship

A Battle of Generations in Saint Louis


The Setting

The 2019 US Chess Championship brought together twelve of America’s finest players at the prestigious Saint Louis Chess Club from March 20 to April 2, 2019. With $194,000 in prize money and a spot in the World Championship cycle at stake, tensions ran high throughout the elite round-robin event.

The time control was classical: 90 minutes for the first 40 moves, followed by 30 minutes for the rest of the game, with a 30-second increment from move one. This gave players ample time to calculate deeply—though as we’ll see, even world-class grandmasters can falter under pressure.

The Field

The 2019 edition featured a remarkable concentration of talent. Besides our two protagonists, the tournament included:

  • Hikaru Nakamura – Four-time US Champion seeking his fifth title
  • Wesley So – Former US Champion and perennial contender
  • Leinier Dominguez Perez – Cuban-born super-GM making his US Championship debut after becoming a US citizen
  • Sam Shankland – The defending 2018 champion
  • Ray Robson – Consistent top-tier American GM
  • Sam Sevian – One of America’s youngest GMs
  • Var Akobian – Experienced tournament veteran
  • Alex Lenderman – Solid positional player
  • Awonder Liang – Teenage prodigy
  • Timur Gareyev – The eccentric blindfold chess world record holder (who famously played in another tournament during the championship!)

Nakamura would ultimately claim his fifth title with 8/11, edging out Dominguez and Caruana by half a point.


The Players

White: Fabiano Caruana (FIDE 2828)

Just four months before this game, Fabiano Caruana had been on the biggest stage in chess—challenging Magnus Carlsen for the World Championship in London. The match ended in twelve straight draws before Carlsen won the rapid tiebreaks, but Caruana had proven himself as the first American challenger since Bobby Fischer in 1972.

Born in Miami in 1992 to Italian parents, Caruana grew up in Brooklyn and became a chess prodigy under the tutelage of Bruce Pandolfini (yes, that Pandolfini from “Searching for Bobby Fischer”). He earned his GM title at 14, won the 2016 US Championship, and holds the third-highest FIDE rating ever achieved (2844). His legendary performance at the 2014 Sinquefield Cup—7/7 against a field averaging 2802—remains one of chess history’s greatest tournament results.

Black: Jeffery Xiong (FIDE 2663)

At just 18 years old, Jeffery Xiong represented the new generation of American chess talent. Born in Plano, Texas in 2000, Xiong became a GM at 14 (the fourth-youngest American ever) and won the 2016 World Junior Championship—becoming the youngest winner in 28 years and the first American to claim the title in nearly two decades.

Xiong had started the tournament brilliantly, defeating defending champion Shankland in Round 3 and sharing the lead with 2.5/3. A Round 4 loss to Robson dropped him back to the pack, and heading into this Round 6 clash, he faced the daunting task of playing Black against the world’s second-ranked player.


The Game

Event: 2019 US Chess Championship
Site: Saint Louis Chess Club, Missouri
Date: March 25, 2019
Round: 6
White: Caruana, Fabiano (2828)
Black: Xiong, Jeffery (2663)
Result: 1-0
ECO: C65 – Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense

Complete PGN

[Event "US Chess Championship 2019"]
[Site "Saint Louis USA"]
[Date "2019.03.25"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Caruana, Fabiano"]
[Black "Xiong, Jeffery"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C65"]
[WhiteElo "2828"]
[BlackElo "2663"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 Bc5 5. Bxc6 dxc6 6. O-O Qe7 7. Nbd2 Bg4 
8. h3 Bh5 9. a3 a5 10. Nc4 Nd7 11. g4 Bg6 12. b4 Bb6 13. bxa5 Bxa5 14. Bb2 f6 
15. Nxa5 Rxa5 16. Nh4 O-O 17. Nf5 Qe6 18. Kh2 c5 19. h4 c4 20. h5 Bf7 21. Rg1 
cxd3 22. cxd3 Rb5 23. Bc1 Kh8 24. Be3 Rb3 25. Rg3 c5 26. Qe2 g5 27. hxg6 Bxg6 
28. a4 Qa6 29. Bh6 Rg8 30. Rag1 Qxa4 31. Ne7 Qd4 32. Qd1 c4 33. Nxg8 Kxg8 
34. dxc4 Rxg3 35. Qxd4 exd4 36. Kxg3 Bxe4 37. Rd1 d3 38. f3 Bg6 39. Ra1 Kf7 
40. Ra7 Nc5 41. Be3 Ke8 42. Bxc5 d2 43. Ra8+ Kd7 44. Bb6 Kc6 45. Ba5 1-0

Detailed Analysis

The Opening: Anti-Berlin Strategy

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6

Xiong chooses the Berlin Defense—the rock-solid system that Vladimir Kramnik used to dethrone Kasparov in 2000. Its reputation as “the Berlin Wall” stems from the notorious endgame arising after 4.O-O Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8, where Black trades early queens for an ugly-but-defensible structure.

4.d3

Caruana sidesteps the Berlin endgame entirely with the “Anti-Berlin”—a system championed by the first World Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz. By supporting e4 with d3 instead of castling, White maintains more pieces and middlegame complexity.

4…Bc5 5.Bxc6 dxc6 6.O-O Qe7 7.Nbd2 Bg4 8.h3 Bh5

Both sides develop logically. Black’s bishop sortie to g4 pressures the f3-knight and prepares the retreat to g6 where it will eye White’s kingside.

Position after 8...Bh5:
    
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r |   |   |   | k |   |   | r |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | p | p | p |   | q | p | p | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   | p |   |   | n |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   |   | b |   | p |   |   | b |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   |   |   | P |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   |   | P |   | N |   | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | P | P | N |   | P | P |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R |   | B | Q |   | R | K |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

9.a3 a5?!

Stockfish notes this as a slight inaccuracy. Black prevents b4 but weakens the b5-square. The engine preferred 9…Nd7 immediately, preparing to recapture on c5 with the knight if White plays b4.

10.Nc4 Nd7 11.g4 Bg6 12.b4

Caruana demonstrates excellent understanding of this structure. The g4-h4-h5 pawn storm is White’s primary kingside plan, while b4 challenges Black’s bishop and aims to open lines on the queenside.

Position after 12.b4:

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r |   |   |   | k |   |   | r |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   | p | p | n | q | p | p | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   | p |   |   |   | b |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | p |   | b |   | p |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   | P | N |   | P |   | P |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | P |   |   | P |   | N |   | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 |   |   | P |   |   | P |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R |   | B | Q |   | R | K |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

12…Bb6 13.bxa5 Bxa5 14.Bb2 f6

Stockfish slightly preferred 12 ... axb4 13 Bg5 f6 14 axb4. In the game, Black solidifies the e5-pawn but weakens the e6-square—a critical concession that allows White’s knight to land on f5 with tremendous effect.

The Critical Middlegame

15.Nxa5?!

Stockfish slightly prefers keeping the knight on c4, but this capture is perfectly playable.

15…Rxa5 16.Nh4?!

An aggressive but imprecise move. Caruana wants his knight on f5 immediately, but Stockfish suggests the more patient 16.Qe2 or 16.Qe1 first.

16…O-O?!

Black misses 16…O-O-O!, which would have given better counterplay against White’s exposed kingside.

17.Nf5 Qe6 18.Kh2 c5 19.h4 c4 20.h5

Position after 20.h5:

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 |   |   |   |   |   | r | k |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   | p | p | n |   |   | p | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   |   |   | q | p | b |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | r |   |   |   | p | N |   | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   | p |   | P |   | P |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | P |   |   | P |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 |   | B | P |   |   | P |   | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R |   |   | Q |   | R |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

Caruana’s pawn storm is in full swing. The knight on f5 dominates the position, and Black’s bishop on g6 is running out of squares.

20…Bf7?

A significant mistake that hands White a clear advantage. Black should have eliminated the monster knight with 20…Bxf5! 21.gxf5 Qf7 when the position remains complex but defensible. Now White’s attack gains momentum.

21.Rg1?

Caruana returns the favor! Stockfish wanted 21.Bc3!, attacking the rook and preparing to double on the g-file more effectively. Both world-class players are human after all.

21…cxd3 22.cxd3 Rb5?

Another slip. Xiong should have played 22…Qb6!, keeping more active piece placement. The rook on b5 looks aggressive but accomplishes little.

The Tactical Climax

23.Bc1 Kh8?! 24.Be3 Rb3 25.Rg3 c5?!

Black’s pieces are awkwardly placed. The rook on b3 is out of play, and the knight on d7 has no good squares.

26.Qe2 g5??

Position after 26...g5:

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 |   |   |   |   |   | r |   | k |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   | p |   | n |   | b |   | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   |   |   | q | p |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   |   | p |   | p | N | p | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   |   |   | P |   | P |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | P | r |   | P | B |   | R |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 |   |   |   |   | Q | P |   | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

A serious mistake born of desperation. Xiong tries to break the bind, but this weakens his king fatally. The engine strongly preferred 26…Rg8, maintaining defensive chances.

27.hxg6 Bxg6 28.a4 Qa6 29.Bh6 Rg8 30.Rag1

Caruana’s pieces swarm the kingside. The bishop on h6 is devastating, preventing Black’s king from escaping via g7.

30…Qxa4 31.Ne7?

Even Caruana stumbles in the complications! The spectacular 31.g5! was crushing, ripping open lines toward the black king. After 31…fxg5 32.Rxg5 White’s attack is overwhelming.

31…Qd4 32.Qd1 c4??

The decisive blunder. Under pressure, Xiong cracks. The calm 32…Ra3 would have kept Black in the game, though White retains an edge.

33.Nxg8 Kxg8 34.dxc4 Rxg3 35.Qxd4 exd4 36.Kxg3

The smoke clears to reveal a technically winning endgame for White. Black has a bishop and passed d-pawn for the exchange, but White’s material advantage and better-coordinated pieces prove decisive.

The Technical Phase

36…Bxe4 37.Rd1 d3 38.f3 Bg6

Position after 38...Bg6:

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 |   |   |   |   |   |   | k |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   | p |   | n |   |   |   | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   |   |   |   | p | b | B |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   | P |   |   |   | P |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   |   | p |   | P | K |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 |   |   |   | R |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

White: Kg3, Rd1, Bh6, pawns c4, f3, g4
Black: Kg8, Nd7, Bg6, pawns b7, d3, f6, h7

(Note: White bishop on h6 was exchanged earlier; position shows the endgame structure)

39.Ra1 Kf7 40.Ra7 Nc5 41.Be3 Ke8?

Another mistake in a difficult position. Xiong needed 41...Nd7 to keep his knight active and protect the b7-pawn.

42.Bxc5 d2?

Desperation. The passed pawn looks dangerous but White easily handles it.

43.Ra8+ Kd7 44.Bb6! Kc6 45.Ba5!

Final Position


  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | R |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 |   | p |   |   |   |   |   | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 |   |   | k |   |   | p | b |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | B |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 |   |   | P |   |   |   | P |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 |   |   |   |   |   | P | K |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 |   |   |   | p |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h    

White: Ka3, Ra8, Ba5, pawns c4, f3, g4 Black: Kc6, Bg6, pawns b7, d2, f6, h7

Black resigned (1-0)

Black’s position is hopeless. The d2-pawn will fall after Rd8, and White’s rook will invade decisively. The bishop on a5 controls the critical d8-square and prevents any counterplay.


Lessons for Club Players

1. The Power of the Knight on f5

Throughout this game, Caruana’s knight on f5 was a dominant piece. Planted on this outpost—supported by pawns on e4 and g4—it controlled key squares (e7, g7, h6, d6, e3) and restricted Black’s pieces severely. When your opponent allows a knight to reach f5 (or f4 for Black), consider whether you should immediately trade it off or suffer its presence.

Takeaway: If you can establish a knight on f5 in a Spanish-type position, prioritize supporting it. If your opponent has such a knight, exchange it if possible, especially before castling kingside.

2. Pawn Storms Require Piece Coordination

Caruana’s g4-h4-h5 advance wasn’t just random aggression — it was coordinated with:
- Knight landing on f5
- Bishop ready to deploy to c1-h6 diagonal
- Rooks prepared to use the g-file

The lesson: advancing pawns in front of your king requires that your pieces support the attack. Xiong’s pieces, by contrast, were uncoordinated (rook on b3, knight on d7, queen shuffling), which allowed Caruana’s attack to succeed.

3. Trading Bad Pieces

Black’s light-squared bishop spent the game being pushed around by White’s pawns. On move 20, Black had the opportunity to exchange it for the dominant knight with 20…Bxf5!, but declined. This would have:
- Eliminated White’s best piece
- Given Black’s remaining pieces more breathing room
- Opened the g-file for potential counterplay

Takeaway: Don’t be sentimental about the bishop pair. If one of your bishops is bad and your opponent has a monster knight, trade it!

4. Pressure Causes Mistakes

Xiong is a world-class player who has beaten super-GMs. Yet under Caruana’s sustained pressure, he committed multiple inaccuracies (20…Bf7?, 22…Rb5?, 26…g5?, 32…c4??). Club players often think professionals don’t blunder, but even elite GMs crack when:
- Under constant pressure
- In time trouble
- Facing difficult defensive tasks

Takeaway: Even if your position is slightly worse, keep fighting! Maintain pressure, and your opponent may crack.

5. The Importance of Prophylaxis

Several of Xiong’s problems stemmed from failing to anticipate Caruana’s plans. A prophylactic approach would ask: “What does my opponent want to do, and how can I prevent it?”

When Caruana was building his kingside attack, Black needed to consider:
- Can I trade off his attacking pieces?
- Can I create counterplay elsewhere?
- Should I close the position or open it?

Instead, Black’s moves like 26…g5? helped White’s attack rather than hindering it.


Statistical Summary

Caruana (White)

  • Good moves: 31 (68.9%)
  • Inaccuracies: 7
  • Mistakes: 2
  • Average centipawn loss: 15.6

Xiong (Black)

  • Good moves: 22 (50.0%)
  • Inaccuracies: 11
  • Mistakes: 5
  • Blunders: 1
  • Average centipawn loss: 24.1

Conclusion

This game showcased Fabiano Caruana’s exceptional understanding of the Anti-Berlin system and his ability to generate a kingside attack while maintaining positional control. Though both players made mistakes—this was no computer game—Caruana’s pressure eventually told, and the young Jeffery Xiong cracked at the critical moment.

For club players, this game offers valuable lessons about piece coordination, the importance of trading off dominant enemy pieces, and how sustained pressure can induce errors even from the best players in the world.

The 2019 US Championship ultimately went to Hikaru Nakamura, but games like this one remind us why Fabiano Caruana remains one of the most feared attackers in world chess—and why Jeffery Xiong, despite this loss, has the talent to challenge for American supremacy for years to come.


Analysis generated with Stockfish engine assistance. Historical and biographical information gathered from Saint Louis Chess Club, Chess.com, US Chess Federation, and FIDE records.

2025-12-04

claude knows chess: Caruana vs Carlsen, 2022-01-29

I wrote a package (with claude and gemini's help) that takes a database of Caruana games, runs them all through stockfish for analysis, then ranks them, then creates a terse latex report for selected top games (such as the game discussed in this column, bwt, I plan to post these python files to github at some point). This latex report was run through Claude and a "chess blog version" of the report was created. The markdown response from claude (sonnet 4.5) was converted to html using pacdoc. I edited this html in emacs, mostly for readability.

Enjoy! (The image below is from chess.com.)

To repeat: based on the above-mentioned python-stockfish programs, claude wrote this blog post, with some minor editing by wdj.

When Excellence Meets Perfection: Carlsen’s Championship-Clinching Victory Over Caruana

Tata Steel Masters 2022, Round 12

Wijk aan Zee, Netherlands | January 29, 2022


Tournament Context

The 84th Tata Steel Chess Tournament is one of the most prestigious events in chess, often called “the Wimbledon of Chess.” Held annually in the Dutch coastal town of Wijk aan Zee, it brings together the world’s elite players for an intense two-week battle.

Tournament Details: - Dates: January 14-30, 2022 - Format: 14 players, 13-round single round-robin - Time Control: 100 minutes for the first 50 moves, then 15 minutes with 30-second increment per move - Prize Fund: Significant, with the winner receiving the coveted trophy

The Elite Field:

This year’s Masters section was exceptionally strong, featuring: - Magnus Carlsen (Norway) - World Champion, rated 2865 - Fabiano Caruana (USA) - Former World Championship challenger, rated 2792 - Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (Azerbaijan) - Multiple tournament winner - Richard Rapport (Hungary) - Creative and dangerous attacker - Anish Giri (Netherlands) - Local favorite and perennial contender - Sergey Karjakin (Russia) - Former World Championship challenger - Jorden van Foreest (Netherlands) - Defending champion - Andrey Esipenko (Russia) - Rising star - Jan-Krzysztof Duda (Poland) - 2021 World Cup winner - Vidit Gujrathi (India) - Top Indian grandmaster - Plus Shankland, Praggnanandhaa, Grandelius, and Dubov

The Situation Going Into Round 12:

By Round 12, Magnus Carlsen had built a commanding lead and needed only a draw against Caruana to clinch his eighth Tata Steel title with a round to spare. However, in typical Carlsen fashion, he decided to play for a win. “A draw was very good for me, but I guess I was feeling a bit bolder than normal,” he said afterward. “I kind of wanted to play. He clearly wanted to play as well, so we got a good fight.”

This was the 55th classical game between these titans. Coming into this game, Carlsen led their head-to-head 11-5 with 38 draws.


The Game

White: Fabiano Caruana
Black: Magnus Carlsen
Result: 0-1 (Black wins)
Opening: Rossolimo Variation of the Sicilian Defense (B30)

Complete Game Score with Analysis

1. e4 c5

The Sicilian Defense - Black’s most popular and aggressive response to 1.e4. Carlsen, needing only a draw, chooses his most trusted weapon.

2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5

The Rossolimo Variation. Caruana avoids the theoretical mazes of the Open Sicilian, looking for a strategic battle where his excellent positional understanding can shine.

3…g6 4. O-O Bg7 5. c3 Nf6

Black develops naturally with a fianchetto setup, a solid and flexible choice.

6. Re1

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r | . | b | q | k | . | . | r |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | p | p | . | p | p | p | b | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | . | n | . | . | n | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | B | p | . | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | . | . | . | . | P | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | . | . | P | . | . | N | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | P | . | P | . | P | P | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R | N | B | Q | . | R | . | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

White prepares d4, keeping maximum flexibility.

6…O-O 7. d4 d5 8. e5

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r | . | b | q | . | r | k | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | p | p | . | . | p | p | b | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | . | n | . | . | n | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | B | p | p | P | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | . | . | . | P | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | . | . | P | . | . | N | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | P | . | . | . | P | P | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R | N | B | Q | . | R | . | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

The game reaches a critical juncture. White establishes a space advantage with the e5 pawn.

8…Ne4

A key move in this structure. The knight on e4 is perfectly placed, controlling important central squares.

9. Be3 cxd4 10. cxd4

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | r | . | b | q | . | r | k | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | p | p | . | . | p | p | b | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | . | n | . | . | . | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | B | . | p | P | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | . | . | . | P | n | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | . | . | . | . | B | N | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | P | . | . | . | P | P | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | R | N | . | Q | . | R | . | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

The central structure is now clarified. White has a strong center but Black has active piece play.

10…Qb6 11. Qe2 Bd7 12. Ba4 Rac8 13. Nc3 Nxc3 14. bxc3 Qd8

Both sides develop logically. Black exchanges the knight to reduce White’s attacking potential, while White maintains a solid center.

15. Bb3?!

Inaccuracy. The bishop is slightly less active on b3. While this isn’t a major mistake, it gives Black more breathing room. The position slightly favors Black now.

15…Na5 16. Rac1 Nxb3 17. axb3 Qb6

The exchanges have clarified the position. Black has eliminated a potentially troublesome piece.

18. Qa2

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | . | . | r | . | . | r | k | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | p | p | . | b | p | p | b | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | q | . | . | . | . | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | . | . | p | P | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | . | . | . | P | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | . | P | P | . | B | N | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | Q | . | . | . | . | P | P | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | . | . | R | . | . | R | . | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

18…a5 19. Qa3?!

Inaccuracy. The queen is awkwardly placed on a3. White’s position becomes slightly uncomfortable as the queen lacks good squares.

19…Rfe8 20. c4 dxc4 21. bxc4?!

Inaccuracy. Now White’s pawn structure is compromised. The c4 pawn could become weak.

21…Qa6 22. c5 Bc6?!

Inaccuracy by Black. This allows White to consolidate slightly. Better was keeping more tension.

23. Rb1?! a4?!

Both sides make minor inaccuracies. The position remains complex and double-edged.

The Critical Phase Begins

24. Rec1?

Mistake! This passive move allows Black to seize the initiative. White should have played 24. Nd2 to coordinate better. The rooks are now congested on the c-file and lack coordination.

24…Rcd8?

Mistake by Black! Missing the strong 24…b5!, which would have put immediate pressure on White’s position. Both players are showing the difficulty of this complex middlegame.

25. Nd2?!

Another inaccuracy. White continues with a passive plan.

25…Qe2 26. f3??

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | . | . | . | r | r | . | k | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | . | p | . | . | p | p | b | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | . | b | . | . | . | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | . | P | . | P | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | p | . | . | P | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | Q | . | . | . | B | P | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | . | . | . | N | q | . | P | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | . | R | R | . | . | . | . | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

Critical Mistake! This seriously weakens White’s king position and creates tactical vulnerabilities. 26. Nf3 was essential, keeping pieces coordinated and the king safer. As Carlsen said after the game, “The wrong plan. The exchange sac was just screaming to be played.”

26…Rxd4!!

The key tactical blow! Black sacrifices the exchange (rook for bishop), but White’s position collapses. This move combines tactics with deep positional understanding - the two bishops will dominate the position.

27. Bxd4 Qxd2 28. Rd1

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | . | . | . | . | r | . | k | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | . | p | . | . | p | p | b | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | . | b | . | . | . | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | . | P | . | P | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | p | . | . | B | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | Q | . | . | . | . | P | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | . | . | . | q | . | . | P | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | . | R | . | R | . | . | . | K |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

White tries to fight but is already in serious trouble.

28…Qf4 29. Qb4?!

Inaccuracy. White’s queen continues to be misplaced.

29…e6 30. Bc3?

Mistake! This allows Black to force a queen trade under favorable circumstances. 30. Qa5 was better, trying to create some counterplay.

30…Qxb4! 31. Bxb4?

Mistake! White should recapture with the rook (31. Rxb4), keeping more pieces on the board. Now the endgame is nearly lost for White.

31…Bxe5!

Black gobbles up the e5 pawn, and the two bishops are absolutely dominant. As Carlsen explained: “It might seem a bit paradoxical that I should exchange queens while I am an exchange down, but I think my bishops are so strong in the endgame that he just has no chance.”

32. Ba3 Bf6 33. Kf2 Be7 34. Rb6!

White tries to activate the rook, but Black’s position is fundamentally superior.

34…Rc8 35. Rd2 f6 36. f4?

Mistake! This creates more weaknesses. 36. Ke3 was more resilient.

36…e5? 37. fxe5 fxe5 38. Re2?

Mistake by White. 38. Rdb2 offered more resistance. White’s position is deteriorating rapidly.

38…Rf8+ 39. Ke1! Rf5? 40. Rb1?!

Both sides make small errors in this complex position, but Black’s advantage remains overwhelming.

40…e4 41. Rc1?

Mistake! The rook would be better placed on f2. Now Black’s pawns roll forward dangerously.

41…Bh4+ 42. g3!

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | . | . | . | . | . | . | k | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | . | p | . | . | . | . | . | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | . | b | . | . | . | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | . | P | . | . | r | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | p | . | . | . | p | . | . | b |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | B | . | . | . | . | . | P | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | . | . | . | . | R | . | . | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | . | . | R | . | K | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

White blocks the check, but the position remains hopeless.

42…Bg5 43. Rb1??

Blunder! A decisive error. White should have played 43. Rc4, creating some counterplay. Now Black’s attack becomes unstoppable.

43…Rf3!

Black’s rook penetrates to the third rank with devastating effect.

44. Bc1 Bf6? 45. Rb6! Rf5 46. Ba3 Kf7!

Black regroups and brings the king up to support the pawns.

47. Rf2??

The final blunder! White collapses. 47. Ra2 was necessary, though Black is still winning. This move loses immediately by allowing Black to trade rooks.

47…Rf3 48. Rxf3

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | . | p | . | . | . | k | . | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | R | b | . | . | b | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | . | P | . | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | p | . | . | . | p | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | B | . | . | . | . | R | P | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | . | . | . | . | K | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

48…exf3?

A slight inaccuracy - though the position is completely winning regardless. Black now has a passed f-pawn and the bishop pair against a lone rook.

49. Kf1 Bd4

Final Position

  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | . | p | . | . | . | k | . | p |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | . | R | b | . | . | . | p | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | . | . | P | . | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | p | . | . | b | . | . | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | B | . | . | . | . | p | P | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | P |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | . | . | . | . | . | K | . | . |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
    a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h

Black’s position is completely winning. The bishop on d4 controls key squares, the passed f-pawn is unstoppable, and White’s pieces are completely uncoordinated. Caruana resigned shortly after (the game continued a few more moves but was hopeless).

Final Result: 0-1


Key Lessons for Club Players

1. The Power of the Two Bishops in Open Positions

The critical turning point was move 26…Rxd4!, sacrificing the exchange (rook for bishop). This illustrates a fundamental principle: in positions with few pawns and open lines, two bishops can be worth more than a rook. The bishops controlled the entire board, while White’s rook had no meaningful targets.

Practical takeaway: Don’t be afraid to sacrifice material if you can obtain overwhelming positional compensation. In this case, Carlsen got two powerful bishops and a dominant position.

2. Piece Coordination is Crucial

Throughout the game, White’s pieces became increasingly uncoordinated. Notice how after 24. Rec1?, White’s rooks were tripping over each other on the c-file, the queen was misplaced on a3, and the knight on d2 was passive. Meanwhile, Black’s pieces worked together harmoniously.

Practical takeaway: Before making a move, ask yourself: “Will my pieces be working together after this move?” Avoid putting multiple pieces on the same file or diagonal unless there’s a concrete reason.

3. Weak Pawns Create Long-Term Problems

White’s pawn weaknesses (especially the isolated c5 pawn and the weakened kingside after f3) became targets that Black exploited. These structural defects lasted the entire game.

Practical takeaway: Every pawn move creates permanent changes to the position. Be especially careful about pawn moves that: - Isolate your pawns - Create holes in front of your king - Push pawns forward where they can become targets

4. Queen Placement Matters

White’s queen was poorly placed throughout much of the game (a3, b4). A misplaced queen is a common theme in club games. The queen needs flexibility and scope.

Practical takeaway: The queen should usually be centralized or attacking meaningful targets, not stuck on the side of the board defending pawns.

5. When to Accept a Draw vs. Play for a Win

Carlsen could have drawn easily but chose to play for complications. However, he did so from a solid position where he wasn’t taking unreasonable risks. This is different from playing desperately for a win from an inferior position.

Practical takeaway: When you need a draw, don’t be passive - but also don’t take wild risks. Play normal chess and make your opponent prove they can beat you.

6. Calculation Must Include Defensive Resources

White’s 26. f3?? shows what happens when you don’t consider all of your opponent’s tactical responses. After this move, Black’s exchange sacrifice became devastating.

Practical takeaway: Before playing a committal move (especially pawn moves near your king), calculate your opponent’s most forcing responses: checks, captures, and threats.

7. The Endgame Started in the Middlegame

Carlsen willingly traded queens despite being down the exchange because he understood the resulting endgame was winning. This required precise evaluation.

Practical takeaway: Study typical endgames (like bishop pair vs. rook) so you know when to simplify and when to keep pieces on. Carlsen’s confidence in the endgame allowed him to make brave decisions in the middlegame.


Statistical Overview

White (Caruana): - Total moves: 49 - Good moves: 24 (49.0%) - Inaccuracies: 11 - Mistakes: 7 - Blunders: 2

Black (Carlsen): - Total moves: 49 - Good moves: 29 (59.2%) - Inaccuracies: 10 - Mistakes: 5 - Blunders: 0

The statistics reveal an interesting story: both players made errors, but Carlsen made no blunders while Caruana made two critical ones. In games between elite players, it’s often not about playing perfectly, but about avoiding the biggest mistakes.


Tournament Aftermath

This victory secured Carlsen’s eighth Tata Steel Masters title, cementing his status as the most successful player in the tournament’s history. He finished with an impressive 9½/13, a full point ahead of Shakhriyar Mamedyarov and Richard Rapport who tied for second with 8/13.

For Caruana, this loss was disappointing in a tournament where he struggled to find his best form, finishing in a tie for 7th-8th place with 6½/13. However, his willingness to fight against the World Champion, even in a must-win scenario for Carlsen, showed his competitive spirit.

The game demonstrates why Carlsen has dominated world chess for over a decade: his ability to find practical chances in any position, his fearlessness in complex situations, and his superior endgame technique all combined to produce another memorable victory.


Final Thoughts

This game exemplifies chess at the highest level - not perfection, but two world-class players battling through complexity, making critical decisions under time pressure, and ultimately one finding the key ideas while the other faltered at crucial moments.

For club players, this game offers numerous instructive moments: the importance of piece coordination, the power of the bishop pair, the critical nature of pawn structure, and the value of understanding typical endgames. Most importantly, it shows that even games between the world’s best players are decided by concrete mistakes and missed opportunities - just like our own games, but at a much higher level.

Carlsen’s post-game comment captured the essence perfectly: “I feel like the endgame was pretty much winning from the get-go. He found some nice resources, but I think eventually it’s always gonna win.” This confidence, based on deep understanding and precise calculation, is what separates the world champion from the rest.

2025-12-02

Claude knows chess: Nakamura vs Caruana, 2023-05-11, analysis

I wrote a package (with claude and gemini's help) that takes a database of Caruana games, runs them all through stockfish for analysis, then ranks them, then creates a terse latex report for selected top games (such as the game discussed in this column, bwt, I plan to post these python files to github at some point). This latex report was run through Claude and a "chess blog version" of the report was created. I edited this mostly for readability.

Enjoy!

This is based on the python-stockfish programs and written by claude, but edited by wdj.

Nakamura vs Caruana, rapid, Champions Chess Tour, 2023

Clash of American Titans: Nakamura vs. Caruana

A Sicilian Struggle in the 2023 Champions Chess Tour Quarterfinals

Date: May 11, 2023
Event: Champions Chess Tour – Quarter-Finals
Players: GM Hikaru Nakamura (White) vs. GM Fabiano Caruana (Black)
Result: ½–½ (Draw by repetition, 58 moves)
Opening: Sicilian Defense, Moscow Variation with Maroczy Bind


The Tournament Setting

The 2023 Champions Chess Tour represented the pinnacle of online rapid chess competition, bringing together the world's elite players in a series of high-stakes knockout events throughout the year. With a combined prize pool exceeding $2 million across six major tournaments, the CCT attracted virtually every top grandmaster in the world.

This quarterfinal clash between Hikaru Nakamura and Fabiano Caruana—two of America's finest chess talents—was always destined to be a headline matchup. By May 2023, both players were in peak form: Nakamura, the five-time U.S. Champion and dominant online chess personality, had already proven himself nearly unstoppable in rapid formats. Caruana, the 2018 World Championship challenger and reigning U.S. Champion, had been showing renewed strength in both classical and rapid chess.

The tournament field featured a who's who of elite chess: Magnus Carlsen, the newly-crowned former World Champion; Wesley So, another American super-GM; Nodirbek Abdusattorov, the young Uzbek world rapid champion; Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, France's longtime number one; and rising stars like India's Gukesh and Praggnanandhaa. The time control for CCT events was typically 15 minutes plus a 3-second increment per move, demanding both precise calculation and practical decision-making under pressure.


Opening Theory: The Moscow Variation with a Maroczy Twist

Nakamura opened with 1.e4, inviting a theoretical battle. Caruana responded with his trusted 1...c5, the Sicilian Defense—perhaps the most combative reply to 1.e4 and a cornerstone of his repertoire.

The game entered the Moscow Variation after 3.Bb5+, a line that sidesteps the razor-sharp Open Sicilians while retaining practical winning chances. After 3...Nd7 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O a6, Nakamura unveiled his plan: 6.c4—establishing the Maroczy Bind structure.

A natural question arises: why didn't Caruana grab the "free" e4-pawn with 6...Nxe4? The answer lies in a clever tactical point: after 7.Re1 Nf6 8.d4, White has rapid development and a powerful center. The bishop pair, open e-file, and strong d4-d5 push give White a lasting positional advantage that more than compensates for the pawn. Black's extra pawn would be difficult to hold, and his development would lag dangerously. Caruana wisely declined the bait.

This pawn formation (pawns on c4 and e4 controlling the central d5 square) has been a strategic weapon since the 19th century, named after the Hungarian master Géza Maróczy. The bind restricts Black's counterplay and gives White a lasting space advantage, though Black's position remains solid if handled correctly.


The Complete Game with Analysis

Here is the full game with critical moments highlighted:

[Event "CCT Quarter-Finals"]

[Site "Online"]

[Date "2023.05.11"]

[Round "4.1"]

[White "Nakamura, Hikaru"]

[Black "Caruana, Fabiano"]

[Result "1/2-1/2"]

[Opening "Sicilian, Moscow Variation"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bb5+ Nd7 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O a6 6.c4 e6

As indicated above, after 6...Nxe4?, White has 7.Re1 Nf6 8.d4, with a positional advantage that more than compensates for the pawn.

7.Nc3 Be7 8.d4 cxd4 9.Nxd4 Qc7 10.Qe2 O-O

The Opening Phase (Moves 1-10): Both players handle the opening accurately. Nakamura establishes the Maroczy Bind with c4, and Caruana develops harmoniously. After castling, Black has achieved a comfortable position.

11.Be3?

Critical Mistake #1: This natural-looking developing move is actually an error. Stockfish indicates that 11.Kh1 was more precise, prophylactically removing the king from any potential discoveries or ...Ng4 ideas. By playing Be3, White's position becomes slightly more vulnerable to Black's piece activity. The bishop on e3 can become a target, and White loses some coordination.

11...Ne5 12.Bb3 Bd7 13.Rac1 Rac8 14.f3 Rfe8 15.Nb1 Qb8

White plays a curious regrouping with Nb1, intending Nc3 again or possibly Nd2. This is a known idea in such structures to redeploy the knight, but the execution becomes problematic. Black's 15...Qb8 unpins the knight and prepares ...b5.

16.Rc2?

Critical Mistake #2: A significant inaccuracy. White's rook placement on c2 is passive and doesn't support any concrete plan. Stockfish preferred 16.Nc3, maintaining normal piece coordination. The text move allows Black to equalize completely and even seize the initiative.

16...Bd8?

Missed Opportunity: Surprisingly, Caruana returns the favor! The engine screams for 16...b5!, immediately challenging White's center and queenside structure. After 16...b5, Black would have excellent counterplay. Instead, the bishop retreat is slow and allows White to reorganize.

17.Kh1? Ng6?

Mutual Errors: Both players continue missing the key idea. Again 17...b5! was called for, while White should have played Nc3. The position remains balanced, but both sides are missing optimal continuations.

18.Qd2 Bc7 19.Bg1 Rcd8 20.Nc3 b5 21.cxb5 axb5 22.a4 bxa4

23.Bxa4 d5!

The Breakthrough: Finally, Caruana executes the thematic central break. With ...d5, Black opens the position and activates all his pieces. The pawn structure transforms completely. This move deserves the exclamation mark—it's not just "a good move" but the culmination of Black's strategy, transforming a cramped position into an active one.

24.Bxd7 Rxd7 25.Nc6 Qb7 26.exd5 Nxd5 27.Nxd5 Rxd5 28.Qb4 Rb5

29.Qa4?

Critical Mistake #3: Nakamura's queen placement is questionable. 29.Qd2 was more flexible, keeping options open. The queen on a4 looks active but is actually somewhat misplaced.

29...Ra8?

Missed Winning Chance: This is arguably the most significant missed opportunity of the game. Caruana could have played 29...Rxb2!, winning the b2-pawn and creating serious practical problems for White. After Rxb2, Black's rooks become extremely active and the knight on c6 would be under pressure. Instead, the rook move to a8 is merely solid, allowing White to stabilize.

30.Qe4 Bd6

Note that now 30...Rxb2?? no longer works—White has the devastating 31.Ne7+!, a discovered check from the queen on e4 that wins Black's queen on b7. This tactical resource explains why Caruana played the solid 30...Bd6 instead. The timing of tactics matters enormously.

31.Bd4? Bf8? 32.Rfc1 h6 33.Bc3?

Critical Mistake #4: White's pieces are getting tangled. 33.Rb1 was more accurate, keeping the rooks connected and maintaining flexibility. The bishop on c3 blocks the rook and creates coordination problems.

33...Rc8 34.Nd4 Qxe4 35.fxe4

The queens are off, and we've transitioned into a complex minor piece ending. White has a protected passed e-pawn and the more active knight, but Black's position remains defensible.

35...Rb7 36.g3 Be7?

Passive Defense: The bishop retreat to e7 is too slow. Stockfish preferred 36...Rc4!, immediately targeting White's e4-pawn. The rook on c4 would be actively placed, tying down White's pieces to the defense of the e-pawn and preventing White from consolidating. By contrast, 36...Be7 develops the bishop to a passive square where it merely defends, giving White time to improve his position. In endgames, active piece placement trumps passive development.

37.Nf3 Rd8 38.Kg2 Bb4?

Another Passive Choice: Again Caruana opts for a slow move. The engine preferred 38...Bf6!, which accomplishes several things: the bishop on f6 would contest the long diagonal, potentially challenge White's knight, and eye the b2-pawn. More importantly, Bf6 keeps the bishop on an active diagonal where it influences the center. The move 38...Bb4 looks active but the bishop has no real targets on b4—it's just sitting there, accomplishing little, while White's pieces coordinate against Black's position.

39.Bd4 Ne7 40.Rc7 Rb5 41.R1c4 Bd6 42.Ra7 Ng6 43.Bc3 Rdb8

44.Rca4 Ne5 45.Ra8 Rxa8 46.Rxa8+ Kh7 47.Ra5 Rxa5 48.Bxa5 Nd3

The position has simplified to knight versus bishop. White's bishop controls important squares, but Black's knight is actively placed and the pawn structure is balanced.

49.Bc3 f5 50.exf5 exf5 51.Nd4 f4 52.Ne6 g5 53.gxf4 gxf4

54.Kf3 Kg6

Despite White's slight edge, precise defense holds.

55.Ke4 Nf2+ 56.Kf3 Nd3 57.Ke4 Nf2+ 58.Kf3 Nd3

Draw by repetition. Neither side can make progress. The knight on d3 is perfectly placed, controlling key squares and preventing White's king from advancing. Black achieves a fortress.


The Final Position

Draw by repetition. Black's knight oscillates between d3 and f2,

giving perpetual check to the White king.

The knight cannot be dislodged from the d3-f2 circuit, and White cannot make progress. A fitting end to a hard-fought battle.


Statistical Summary

Player

Good Moves

Inaccuracies

Mistakes

Blunders

Accuracy

Nakamura

39 (67%)

8

6

0

83.6%

Caruana

37 (64%)

10

6

0

82.7%

Both players made no blunders but had several inaccuracies and mistakes—characteristic of rapid chess where time pressure and intuition often override deep calculation.


Lessons for Club Players

1. The Maroczy Bind Is a Strategic Weapon

When White establishes pawns on c4 and e4, Black must constantly seek counterplay with ...b5 or ...d5. Without these breaks, Black risks suffocation. In this game, Caruana delayed ...b5 repeatedly (missing it on moves 16, 17, and later), allowing the game to remain balanced rather than seizing an advantage.

Takeaway: If your opponent establishes a bind, prioritize pawn breaks. A cramped position without prospects is much harder to play than an open, dynamic one—even if the break involves some risk.

2. Rook Placement Matters Enormously

Nakamura's 16.Rc2? was a subtle but significant error. The rook accomplished nothing on c2—it wasn't doubling, it wasn't controlling an open file optimally, and it blocked coordination.

Takeaway: Before placing a rook, ask: "What is this rook doing here? What file or rank does it control? Does it support a concrete plan?" A rook needs a job.

3. Prophylaxis Before Development

The computer's recommendation of 11.Kh1 instead of Be3 illustrates a key concept: sometimes the best move isn't development but preventing your opponent's ideas. By tucking the king away, White removes tactical motifs and can develop more safely.

Takeaway: Don't just develop mechanically. Consider what your opponent wants to do, and if a prophylactic move costs little, it may be worth playing.

4. When Ahead, Simplify Carefully

After the queens came off, Nakamura had a slight edge but couldn't convert. The knight vs. bishop ending required very precise technique, and Caruana's active knight created enough counterplay to hold.

Takeaway: In minor piece endings, activity often trumps material. A knight that controls key squares (like Nd3 in the final position) can be worth more than a bishop that has nothing to target.

5. Missed Opportunities Accumulate

Both players had chances to gain decisive advantages—Nakamura with better piece coordination early, Caruana with 29...Rxb2!. Neither capitalized, and the game drifted toward a draw.

Takeaway: Every game contains critical moments. Train yourself to recognize them. Ask at tense moments: "Is there something drastic I can do here?" Even if you don't find the best move, the habit of looking sharpens your tactical vision.


Conclusion

This quarterfinal battle between two of America's greatest chess players showcased the typical tensions of high-level rapid chess: theoretical opening play giving way to practical decisions, mutual errors born of time pressure, and ultimately a draw reflecting the fine margins at the super-GM level.

For Nakamura, the draw was perhaps a slight disappointment given his practical edge in the endgame. For Caruana, missing 29...Rxb2! was a rare defensive lapse, but his tenacious defense in the ending demonstrated why he remains one of the world's most complete players.

Their rivalry would continue throughout 2023—meeting again at Norway Chess (where Nakamura dramatically overtook Caruana in the final round), the Speed Chess Championship (Nakamura winning 18.5-8.5), and the Champions Chess Tour Finals. Games like this one remind us that even at the highest level, chess remains a beautifully imperfect struggle.


This analysis incorporates Stockfish engine evaluation alongside practical chess considerations. All evaluations and assessments are designed to be instructive for club-level players while respecting the extraordinary skill demonstrated by both grandmasters.

2025-12-01

Claude knows chess: Caruana vs Anand, 2015-08-26, analysis

I wrote a package (with claude and gemini's help) that takes a database of Caruana games, runs them all through stockfish for analysis, then ranks them, then creates a terse latex report for selected top games (such as the game discussed in this column, bwt, I plan to post these python files to github at some point). This latex report was run through Claude and a "chess blog version" of the report was created. I edited this mostly for readability.

Enjoy!


This is based on the python-stockfish programs and written by claude, but edited by wdj

High-Level Precision: Caruana vs. Anand Draw in Fire

3rd Sinquefield Cup 2015, Round 4

Tournament Context

Event: 3rd Sinquefield Cup 2015
Location: Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Date: August 26, 2015
Round: 4
Time Control: 120 minutes for 40 moves, then 60 minutes for the rest of the game, with 30 seconds increment per move starting from move 41

White: Fabiano Caruana (USA, 2808)
Black: Viswanathan Anand (India, 2816)
Result: ½-½

Opening: Semi-Slav Defense, Anti-Moscow Gambit Variation


Historical Significance

The 2015 Sinquefield Cup represented a watershed moment in elite chess. Held at the Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St. Louis from August 22 to September 3, this was the second leg of the newly created Grand Chess Tour, which linked three premier tournaments: Norway Chess, the Sinquefield Cup, and the London Chess Classic.

This was chess history in the making—one of the strongest tournaments ever organized on American soil. The field included all of the world's top 10 players except one: Magnus Carlsen (World Champion, 2853), Fabiano Caruana (2808), Viswanathan Anand (2816), Veselin Topalov (2816), Levon Aronian (2765), Hikaru Nakamura (2814), Alexander Grischuk (2771), Anish Giri (2773), Maxime Vachier-Lagrave (2731), and Wesley So (2773). This Category XXII event (average rating 2776-2800) featured a total prize fund of $300,000.

The tournament organizers, led by Rex Sinquefield's vision to transform St. Louis into the "chess capital of America," provided world-class conditions: perfect lighting, temperature control, professional arbiters, premium chess sets, and even a "confessional booth" where players could provide real-time analysis to internet audiences mid-game—the first such feature at an American tournament.

By Round 4, the competition was fierce. Levon Aronian and Magnus Carlsen were tied for the lead, while Caruana and Anand were struggling in the lower half of the standings, making this encounter crucial for both players.


The Players

Fabiano Caruana had transferred his federation from Italy to the United States in 2015, becoming America's great hope to challenge for the world championship. At age 23, he was coming off a spectacular 2014 where he achieved a stratospheric 2844 rating. Playing on home soil at the Sinquefield Cup carried extra significance—he had won this event in 2014 (while representing Italy).

Viswanathan Anand, the legendary five-time World Champion from India, was 45 years old but still competing at the highest level. Having lost his world title to Magnus Carlsen in 2013, Anand was proving he remained a force among the elite. His deep understanding of positional chess and encyclopedic opening knowledge made him a formidable opponent in any setting.

This was a battle between American ambition and Indian experience, youth versus mastery.


The Complete Game

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6

The Semi-Slav Defense—a solid, reliable choice by Anand. This opening has been the backbone of Black's repertoire at the highest level for decades, offering both solidity and dynamic possibilities.

3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6

The classical setup. Black builds a solid pawn structure and prepares to develop harmoniously.

5. Bg5 h6

The Anti-Moscow Gambit variation. Black challenges the bishop immediately, forcing a decision.

6. Bxf6 Qxf6

An important theoretical moment. White exchanges the bishop for the knight, damaging Black's pawn structure but giving up the bishop pair. This leads to a specific type of middlegame where White has more space but Black has long-term potential with the two bishops.

7. e3 g6

Anand fianchettoes, preparing to develop the dark-squared bishop to its most active diagonal. This is a modern approach to the position.

8. Bd3 Bg7 9. O-O O-O 10. e4!

Caruana plays energetically in the center. Both players are navigating the opening with near-perfect precision.

10...Qd8!

The queen retreats, seemingly passive, but this is sophisticated play. The queen makes room for other pieces and prepares to potentially support central counterplay.

11. Re1?

The first significant inaccuracy. Caruana prepares e5, but this is too slow. Stockfish preferred 11. e5, immediately seizing space in the center.

11...c5!

Anand strikes at the perfect moment! This central break is the thematic response, challenging White's center.

12. exd5?!

Inaccuracy. Caruana opens the position, but this releases the tension prematurely. The position becomes more tactical.

12...cxd4! 13. dxe6?!

Another imprecision. White continues with the forcing sequence but doesn't achieve an advantage.

13...Bxe6!

Perfect recapture. Black has excellent piece activity and the two bishops are beginning to show their strength.

14. Ne2 Qd6 15. Qd2 Nc6 16. Nf4 Bg4

Both players demonstrate deep understanding. The position is sharp and complex, with mutual chances. White has the slight initiative, but Black's pieces are perfectly coordinated.

17. Be4 Bxf3?!

Inaccuracy. Anand exchanges his good bishop for the knight. While this simplifies the position, it also removes one of Black's key pieces. Stockfish preferred keeping more tension with moves like 17...Rac8 or 17...Rad8.

18. Bxf3 Ne5 19. Bd5 Rac8

Black has the powerful knight on e5, while White has a dominant bishop on d5 and better pawn structure.

20. b3 b5 21. Rac1 bxc4 22. bxc4 Rc7

Excellent practical play from both sides. The position remains balanced but interesting, with both players creating active piece play.

23. Nd3 Nxd3?!

A questionable decision. By exchanging the powerful knight, Anand reduces Black's active pieces. Better was maintaining the tension with 23...Nc6, keeping more pieces on the board.

24. Qxd3 Kh7?!

A prophylactic move to avoid back-rank issues, but it wastes time. More natural was 24...Rd7 or 24...Rfc8, activating the rooks.

25. g3 Bf6?!

The bishop heads to a more central position f6 but Black's position is becoming slightly passive.

26. Rb1 Kg7

White activates the rook with tempo, and Black must return the king to a safer square.

27. Rb5 Rfc8 28. Reb1 Rc5

Both sides bring all their pieces into the game. The position features doubled rooks on the b-file for White and doubled rooks on the c-file for Black.

29. a4 Rxb5 30. axb5 Rc7

The first exchange of rooks. White's passed b-pawn could become dangerous in the endgame.

31. Qb3?!

Caruana's queen move is slightly imprecise. Better was 31. Kg2 or 31. h4, improving the king position or creating additional threats.

31...Qe5 32. Qf3?!

Inaccuracy. The queen trade offer doesn't lead anywhere productive. White should have maintained more pressure.

32...Bg5?

Mistake. The bishop move looks active but actually weakens Black's position. Much better was 32...Rd7!, centralizing the rook and maintaining flexibility. After 32...Bg5, White's pieces can coordinate more effectively, and the b-pawn becomes more dangerous.

33. c5!

Excellent! Caruana immediately pushes the passed pawn, creating serious threats.

33...Rd7

Forced. The rook must stop the pawn's advance.

34. b6?!

Another playable option was 34. Bc6, maintaining maximum pressure on the d7-rook, followed by 35. b6.

34...axb6

Anand must capture. The position now enters a critical phase.

35. cxb6?

Mistake! Caruana recaptures automatically, but this allows a powerful tactical blow. Stockfish shows that 35. Bc6! was winning: 35...Rd8 36. cxb6 and the b-pawn is unstoppable: 36...d3 37. Kg2 and White is clearly better.

After 35. cxb6?, Black can fight back effectively.

35...Rxd5!

Brilliant! Anand finds the only defense. Black sacrifices the exchange (rook for bishop) to eliminate White's powerful centralized piece and create dangerous passed pawns of his own.

36. Qxd5 Qxd5 37. b7 d3

Both sides race their pawns. This is the critical moment—who will promote first?

38. b8=Q d2

White gets a queen, but Black's d-pawn is one square from promoting!

39. Rd1

The only move. White must blockade the pawn immediately.

39...Qf3

Anand activates the queen with threats. The position is now a queen and bishop versus queen endgame with Black's dangerous passed pawn.

40. Qb2+ Kh7 41. Qc2 Be3

Black's bishop and pawn create sufficient counterplay. White cannot make progress without allowing perpetual check.

42. fxe3 Qxe3+

The position after this move is a theoretical draw. With the bishop gone and the d-pawn blockaded, neither side can make progress without allowing the opponent's queen to give perpetual check.

Game Drawn by Agreement

In the resulting queen endgame, neither player has realistic winning chances. The position is completely balanced, and both players agreed to split the point.


Statistical Summary

White (Caruana)

  • Total moves: 42
  • Good moves: 30 (71.4%)
  • Inaccuracies: 5
  • Mistakes: 2
  • Blunders: 0
  • Average centipawn loss: 11.5

Black (Anand)

  • Total moves: 42
  • Good moves: 32 (76.2%)
  • Inaccuracies: 4
  • Mistakes: 1
  • Blunders: 0
  • Average centipawn loss: 10.5

These statistics reveal an exceptionally high-quality game. Both players maintained an accuracy rate above 70% with no blunders—remarkable for a complex middlegame battle. Anand actually had slightly better accuracy (76.2% vs 71.4%), and his average centipawn loss was marginally lower (10.5 vs 11.5).

This is elite chess at its finest: deep preparation, precise execution, and both players navigating complexity with minimal errors.


Key Lessons for Club Players

1. Opening Preparation at the Highest Level

The first 10 moves of this game were played with near-perfect accuracy by both sides (all marked with "!" by the engine). This demonstrates the importance of:

  • Knowing critical theoretical positions
  • Understanding the resulting pawn structures
  • Having a clear plan from the opening

Lesson: Study complete games in your openings, not just the first 10-15 moves. Understanding what White wants (space, initiative) and what Black wants (the bishop pair, counterplay) helps you navigate the middlegame.

2. The Power and Peril of the Bishop Pair

Anand's fianchettoed bishop on g7 was a long-term asset, but he ultimately had to sacrifice it (17...Bxf3) and then later sacrificed the exchange (35...Rxd5) to equalize. This shows:

  • The bishop pair is powerful in open positions
  • But bishops need time and space to realize their potential
  • Sometimes, material must be sacrificed for activity

Lesson: The bishop pair is worth about 0.5 pawns in the opening but can be worth much more in open positions with play on both sides of the board. Don't overvalue it in closed positions.

3. When to Exchange Pieces

Both players made critical decisions about piece exchanges:

  • Move 17: Anand exchanged his good bishop (Bxf3)
  • Move 23: Anand exchanged his active knight (Nxd3)
  • Move 35: Anand sacrificed the exchange (Rxd5)

Lesson: Before exchanging pieces, ask:

  1. "Does this piece exchange help my position or my opponent's?"
  2. "Am I trading my active pieces for my opponent's passive ones?" (Generally bad)
  3. "Will this exchange improve my pawn structure or worsen it?"

The move 23...Nxd3 was questionable because Anand traded his most active piece for White's relatively passive knight.

4. Passed Pawns Must Be Pushed (But Carefully)

The game's climax centered on White's b-pawn and Black's d-pawn race:

  • White pushed b5-b6-b7-b8=Q
  • Black pushed d4-d3-d2
  • The race ended in a balanced queen endgame

Lesson: In the endgame, passed pawns become tremendously powerful. However, timing is everything:

  • Push when you have adequate support
  • Calculate forcing sequences (like 35. cxb6? allowing 35...Rxd5!)
  • Sometimes the threat is stronger than the execution

5. The Importance of the Exchange Sacrifice

Move 35...Rxd5! was the key defensive resource. By sacrificing the exchange (rook for bishop), Anand:

  • Eliminated White's powerful centralized bishop
  • Created a dangerous passed d-pawn
  • Generated sufficient counterplay to equalize

Lesson: Don't be materialistic! A rook is nominally worth about 5 points and a bishop about 3, but positional factors (piece activity, pawn structure, king safety) can outweigh material. When facing overwhelming positional pressure, consider an exchange sacrifice to relieve the pressure.

6. Queen Endgames are Drawish

After move 42, the position was a queen endgame with White's extra pawn balanced by Black's active queen. These positions are notoriously difficult to win because:

  • The queen is so powerful it can give perpetual check
  • King safety becomes paramount
  • Small material advantages rarely matter

Lesson: In queen endgames, the active side (better piece placement, safer king) often has better practical chances than the side with an extra pawn. Activity trumps material.

7. Precision Under Pressure

Despite both players making small inaccuracies, neither blundered. In a tournament with this level of competition:

  • Mental stamina is crucial
  • Calculation must be precise
  • Psychological pressure is immense

Lesson: In your own games, when you reach a critical position, take your time. Both players spent significant time on critical moves (like move 35), knowing that one error could be fatal. Invest time on the critical moments, not on routine developing moves.


Positional Themes

Central Tension and Pawn Breaks

The game's opening featured a classic pawn tension in the center:

  • White had pawns on c4 and d4
  • Black had pawns on c6 and d5
  • The break 11...c5! was perfectly timed

Understanding when to maintain tension versus when to release it is fundamental to chess mastery. Anand waited for the perfect moment—after White's slight inaccuracy 11. Re1?—to strike with c5.

The Isolated d-Pawn Structure (Transformed)

After the central exchanges, Black was left with an isolated d-pawn on d4 (later advancing to d3, then d2). This pawn:

  • Was weak in the middlegame (requiring piece defense)
  • Became strong in the endgame (advancing toward promotion)
  • Created tactical opportunities (the exchange sacrifice on d5)

Doubled Rooks on Files

Both players doubled their rooks:

  • White on the b-file (moves 27-28)
  • Black on the c-file (move 27-28)

This classic endgame technique puts maximum pressure on a single file, but both players found the key defensive resources.

Piece Activity in the Endgame

The crucial moment came at move 35. After 35. cxb6?, White's pieces were uncoordinated:

  • The bishop on d5 was powerful but couldn't support the b-pawn alone
  • The queen on f3 was far from the action
  • The rook on b1 was passively defending

Anand's 35...Rxd5! exploited this lack of coordination brilliantly.


Tournament Context and Aftermath

This hard-fought draw kept both players in the middle of the standings. After Round 4:

  • Levon Aronian and Magnus Carlsen were leading
  • Caruana and Anand remained in the chasing pack
  • The tournament was wide open

Levon Aronian would ultimately win the 2015 Sinquefield Cup, demonstrating exceptional consistency throughout the event. Magnus Carlsen and Veselin Topalov rounded out the podium.

The game demonstrated why the Sinquefield Cup had become one of the world's premier chess events: world-class players, perfect playing conditions, and battles that showcased the highest level of chess understanding.


The Semi-Slav Defense: A Brief Note

The Semi-Slav Defense (1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6) has been a mainstay of elite chess for over a century. It offers Black:

  1. Solidity: The pawn chain c6-d5-e6 is rock-solid
  2. Flexibility: Black can choose between ...dxc4, ...c5, or maintaining the tension
  3. Dynamic potential: The bishop pair and central breaks create counterplay
  4. Theoretical depth: Enormous amounts of theory reward deep preparation

The Anti-Moscow variation (5. Bg5 h6 6. Bxf6 Qxf6) specifically aims to:

  • Avoid the massive theory of the Moscow variation (5. Bg5 h6 6. Bh4)
  • Damage Black's pawn structure (doubled f-pawns after Qxf6)
  • Simplify the position while maintaining a slight edge

Both Caruana and Anand were deeply prepared in this line, which explains the high quality of their play through move 10.


Conclusion

This game exemplifies chess at the highest level: two world-class players navigating complex theoretical terrain with exceptional precision, making only minor errors, and demonstrating deep positional understanding. While the result was a draw, the game was far from boring—it featured:

  • Sharp opening theory
  • Tense middlegame maneuvering
  • Critical piece exchanges
  • A dramatic exchange sacrifice
  • A thrilling pawn race
  • A balanced queen endgame

For club players, the game offers invaluable lessons in:

  • Opening preparation and understanding pawn structures
  • Knowing when to exchange pieces
  • The power of passed pawns
  • Exchange sacrifices for positional compensation
  • Queen endgame characteristics
  • Maintaining precision under pressure

The statistics tell the story: with average centipawn losses of only 11.5 (Caruana) and 10.5 (Anand), and accuracy rates above 70%, this was chess played at a level that most club players can only aspire to. Yet by studying such games, we learn the principles that guide decision-making at every level of chess.

As Maurice Ashley said during the tournament commentary: "The organizers have made it such an attractive place to be that everyone knows it and everyone wants to be here." This game between Caruana and Anand showed why—when the world's best players are given perfect conditions, they produce chess of exceptional quality.